Harnessing the Power of Diverse Perspectives to Tackle Global Threats
Abstract
The historical development of a group of nations (The West) has led to a psychological and social worldview (WEIRD) that is not shared by most of the world’s population. This paper examines the role of shared narratives and narrative identity in contributing to the phenomenon of tribalism, which often hinders humanity’s efforts to mitigate global threats. By exploring the potential of facilitated interdisciplinary and international dialogue, this paper argues that harnessing the power of diverse perspectives can lead to better cooperation, collaboration, and problem-solving in the face of the human predicament.
Introduction
The world faces a series of pressing challenges, including biodiversity loss, climate change, pandemics, inequality, and geopolitical tensions, which require urgent international cooperation. However, diverse worldviews and the persistence of tribalism often hinder humanity’s ability to address these threats effectively. This paper explores the potential for interdisciplinary, international, facilitated dialogue to bridge these divides and foster collaboration among diverse groups.
The Roots of WEIRD Worldviews and Tribalism
The historical development of a group of nations (The West) has led to a psychological and social worldview (WEIRD) that is not shared by most of the world’s population. This worldview, characterized by individualism, analytic thinking, and a focus on personal autonomy, contrasts with other cultures’ more collectivist, holistic, and relational perspectives (Henrich et al., 2010; Nisbett, 2003). These diverse worldviews are sustained by shared narratives and narrative identity, which contribute to the phenomenon of tribalism (Berreby, 2005; Chua, 2018). Understanding these factors is crucial for fostering cooperation among diverse groups.
The Challenges and Opportunities of Diverse Worldviews
Diverse worldviews can hinder humanity’s efforts to mitigate global threats by creating divisions and conflicts among groups with different beliefs, values, and interests (Kahan, 2011; Chua, 2018). However, thinking together and learning from each other can help diverse groups overcome these challenges and develop more innovative and effective solutions to complex problems (Mercier & Sperber, 2017; Frankopan, 2015; Chua, 2003).
The Role of Facilitation in Promoting Collaboration
Facilitation plays a crucial role in improving groups’ ability to think together and harness the power of diverse perspectives (Bohm, 1996; Isaacs, 1999). By creating an environment that fosters open, constructive, and well-structured dialogue, facilitation can help groups bridge divides, build trust, and engage in cooperative problem-solving (Kahan, 2017; Putnam, 2007).
Empirical Research and its Impact on Narratives and Practice
Empirical research, informed by interdisciplinary and international perspectives, can better understand the role of narrative, narrative identity, and tribalism in shaping human cooperation and collaboration (Dewey, 1916; Vickers, 1965; Checkland, 1981). By changing narratives and influencing practice, research can help promote more effective communication and collaboration among diverse groups in addressing global threats (Mercier & Sperber, 2017).
Conclusion
Addressing the human predicament requires moving beyond divisions and fostering greater cooperation among diverse groups. By harnessing the power of interdisciplinary, international, facilitated dialogue, we can bridge divides, learn from diverse perspectives, and develop more effective strategies for tackling global threats. Integrating insights from psychology, sociology, history, and other fields can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence human cooperation, collaboration, and learning in the context of addressing global challenges. As we strive to overcome tribalism and the barriers posed by diverse worldviews, we must embrace the potential of facilitated thinking and interdisciplinary research to unlock new pathways for international cooperation. By doing so, we can work together to build a more resilient, inclusive, and sustainable future for all, ultimately improving the human predicament and fostering global collaboration in the face of our shared challenges.
Terry Cooke-Davies
April 2023
References
Berreby, D. (2005). Us and Them: Understanding Your Tribal Mind. Little, Brown and Company.
Bohm, D. (1996). On Dialogue. Routledge.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Chua, A. (2003). World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. Doubleday.
Chua, A. (2018). Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations. Penguin Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. The Macmillan Company.
Frankopan, P. (2015). The Silk Roads: A New History of the World. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.
Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life. Currency.
Kahan, D. M. (2011). Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147-174.
Kahan, D. M. (2017). Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition. Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 575.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2017). The Enigma of Reason. Harvard University Press.
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently…and Why. Free Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137-174.
Vickers, G. (1965). The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making. Chapman and Hall.
