We are the one apex species that has learned to defer its trophic return rather than bear it — and deferral is not escape. The return is not abolished; it is handed forward, to those not yet in the room. That is how a civilisation comes to devour its own future.
Read More
Public debate casts AI as saviour or threat. Three years of daily practice suggests neither is right. The machine is fluent but cannot judge whether what it produces fits the situation. That judgement remains human, and depends on what we are doing about the people, not the machines.
Read More
Two intellectual traditions — one emphasising embodied appreciation (Dewey, Bateson, Vickers, Checkland, Stacey), the other cognitive extension (Haraway, Clark) — have developed independently for decades. This paper argues that their convergence, seen through the lens of Recognition Theory, reveals the metacrisis as cognitive extension outpacing regulatory feedback at civilisational scale, and reframes the Three Horizons model accordingly.
Read More
A dated record of one person’s journey from extractive to generative AI use over thirty-two months, beginning with a pacemaker that kept him alive. The timeline reveals a characteristic pattern: the body leads, the mind follows, practice precedes theory, and the gap between doing and recognising is where the art of judgement operates.
Read More
The AI debate is forming familiar battle lines: ban it versus profit from it. But this binary misses the real question — which is the same question we’ve been failing to answer about ourselves for ten thousand years: under what conditions does this help or harm life?
Read More