Introduction:
As we face unprecedented global challenges, the need for a more inclusive and collaborative approach to problem-solving becomes increasingly evident. A “West is Best” attitude has long dominated international relations, but a growing body of evidence from various fields, including anthropology, neuroscience, history, and political science, calls for a re-evaluation of this perspective. An international interdisciplinary academic study, focused on rethinking this attitude, can draw upon the work of numerous scholars to foster greater understanding and pave the way for more cooperative solutions to the complex issues we face today.
The Rich Tapestry of Supporting Evidence:
The works of scholars such as Iain McGilchrist, Geoffrey Vickers, Eric Wolf, Hugo Mercier, Bill Isaacs, Scott Page, Peter Frankopan, Joseph Henrich, David Graeber, and George Gheverghese Joseph provide a wealth of evidence from diverse fields that challenge the “West is Best” attitude.
Anthropology: Joseph Henrich and Eric Wolf’s research on cultural evolution and global history highlights the importance of considering non-Western societies’ contributions to human development. Similarly, David Graeber’s work on the history of debt and social relations emphasizes the need to understand diverse cultural systems and their influence on global dynamics.
Neuroscience: Iain McGilchrist’s research on brain lateralization explores how different modes of thinking can lead to a more holistic understanding of the world. This supports the case for incorporating diverse perspectives and moving beyond the “West is Best” mentality.
History and Politics: Peter Frankopan’s “The Silk Roads” offers a historical account that challenges the traditional narrative of Western dominance. George Gheverghese Joseph’s work on the history of mathematics reveals the contributions of non-Western cultures to scientific development, further highlighting the limitations of a “West is Best” perspective.
Social Sciences: Geoffrey Vickers’ research on decision-making and Scott Page’s work on diversity and collective intelligence emphasize the benefits of incorporating diverse perspectives and fostering cooperation across cultures and disciplines.
Dialogue and Reasoning: Bill Isaacs’ work on dialogue and Hugo Mercier’s research on the enigma of reason demonstrate the importance of open dialogue, introspection, and collaboration in refining decision-making processes and addressing global challenges.
The Potential of an International Study:
Drawing on this wealth of evidence from various fields, an international interdisciplinary academic study can re-evaluate the “West is Best” attitude and explore alternative narratives. By bringing together scholars from diverse cultural backgrounds and disciplines, this study can foster greater understanding, challenge biases, and promote collaboration across cultures.
A Timely and Necessary Response:
In a world that is more interconnected and interdependent than ever before, an international study rethinking the “West is Best” attitude represents a timely and necessary response to our current situation. By examining the roots of this attitude, exploring new ways of thinking, and drawing upon the extensive supporting evidence from various fields, we can foster greater understanding, promote collaboration, and create a more equitable and sustainable future for all.
Possible objections
While this proposal offers a promising approach to fostering collaboration and understanding, there are potential counterarguments that could be made. For example:
Cultural Relativism: Critics may argue that challenging the “West is Best” attitude could lead to cultural relativism, where all cultural values and practices are considered equally valid. This perspective could make it difficult to criticize or address harmful practices or values, potentially allowing oppressive or harmful systems to persist.
Resource Allocation: Some may argue that resources allocated to such a study could be better spent on more immediate and tangible issues, such as poverty reduction, education, or healthcare. They might contend that investing in an academic study might not yield direct, practical benefits or solutions to pressing global problems.
Western Values and Achievements: Opponents of the proposal might argue that the “West is Best” attitude is justified due to the numerous achievements and advancements that Western societies have made in science, technology, and democratic governance. They could claim that these accomplishments warrant the continued promotion and prioritization of Western values and perspectives.
Political Resistance: Critics might suggest that rethinking the “West is Best” attitude could face political resistance from Western countries, as it may be perceived as undermining their influence and authority on the global stage. This resistance could make it challenging to implement recommendations or foster genuine collaboration between Western and non-Western countries.
Implementation Challenges: Another argument against the proposal might focus on the practical challenges of bringing together scholars from diverse fields and cultural backgrounds. Organizing such a study would require significant logistical effort, funding, and coordination, which could prove difficult to manage and sustain.
Conclusion:
While these counterarguments raise legitimate concerns, as we navigate the complex challenges of the 21st century, it is crucial that we move beyond outdated attitudes and embrace a spirit of humility, introspection, and genuine collaboration. An international interdisciplinary academic study focused on rethinking the “West is Best” attitude offers a promising approach, backed by a wealth of evidence from numerous fields, to addressing our current situation and building a more inclusive and cooperative world for all.
The benefits of fostering greater understanding and collaboration between Western and non-Western countries outweigh the potential drawbacks. By addressing these concerns and acknowledging the complexities of rethinking the “West is Best” attitude, an international interdisciplinary academic study could contribute to building a more inclusive and cooperative global environment.
Terry Cooke-Davies
6th April 2023
